As previously reported, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) began an initiative to accept telephone amendments for simple prosecution issues in May 2020. Considering the initiative’s success in helping CIPO improve efficiency and reduce its backlog, CIPO has decided to expand the list of issues for which telephone amendments are acceptable.
As of February 19, 2021, Examiners are now permitted to call the Applicant of a trademark application (or their Canadian trademark agent) directly to discuss the following deficiencies, instead of sending a formal Examiner’s Report:
- Incorrect visual representation of the trademark
- Incomplete translations and transliterations
- Incorrect trademark type
- Incomplete description
- Simple issues with the statements of goods and services, including Nice classification
- Incomplete mailing address
The Applicant (or their Canadian trademark agent) will then have five business days to respond to the Examiner’s telephone call or message. While the Examiner is not required to send a written Examiner’s Report to raise the above deficiencies, the Applicant (or their Canadian trademark agent) will still have to provide the Examiner with written confirmation to address these deficiencies.
If the Examiner has not received written confirmation from the Applicant or their agent within the five-day deadline, a formal Examiner’s Report will be issued.
We are hopeful that expanding the list of objections that can be communicated by telephone instead of a written Examiner’s Report will improve the efficiency of trademark prosecution in Canada.
For Madrid applications designating Canada, we note that the Canadian Trademarks Office will not communicate with a foreign representative. If no Canadian agent is appointed, the Canadian Trademarks Office will contact the Applicant directly. Accordingly, where the Applicant does not wish to be contacted directly by the Canadian Trademarks Office, it is important to appoint a Canadian agent.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Recording corporate changes with trademark offices: why it matters and what you need to know
Corporate reorganizations and transactions frequently result in changes to trademark ownership. However, the need to formally record those changes with trademark offices is often overlooked. What may ...Read More -
Can you patent your AI? New guidance in Canada and the US for software and AI inventors
Corporate investment in AI continues to accelerate globally and patent filings for AI-related inventions are rising across every major jurisdiction. The threshold question, “Is this invention eligible...Read More -
Trademarks for businesses – part 1: understanding what a trademark is
Every day, consumers rely on trademarks to identify and select goods and services from businesses that they know and trust. Over time, trademarks come to represent not only the goods and services of a...Read More
