As previously reported, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) began an initiative to accept telephone amendments for simple prosecution issues in May 2020. Considering the initiative’s success in helping CIPO improve efficiency and reduce its backlog, CIPO has decided to expand the list of issues for which telephone amendments are acceptable.
As of February 19, 2021, Examiners are now permitted to call the Applicant of a trademark application (or their Canadian trademark agent) directly to discuss the following deficiencies, instead of sending a formal Examiner’s Report:
- Incorrect visual representation of the trademark
- Incomplete translations and transliterations
- Incorrect trademark type
- Incomplete description
- Simple issues with the statements of goods and services, including Nice classification
- Incomplete mailing address
The Applicant (or their Canadian trademark agent) will then have five business days to respond to the Examiner’s telephone call or message. While the Examiner is not required to send a written Examiner’s Report to raise the above deficiencies, the Applicant (or their Canadian trademark agent) will still have to provide the Examiner with written confirmation to address these deficiencies.
If the Examiner has not received written confirmation from the Applicant or their agent within the five-day deadline, a formal Examiner’s Report will be issued.
We are hopeful that expanding the list of objections that can be communicated by telephone instead of a written Examiner’s Report will improve the efficiency of trademark prosecution in Canada.
For Madrid applications designating Canada, we note that the Canadian Trademarks Office will not communicate with a foreign representative. If no Canadian agent is appointed, the Canadian Trademarks Office will contact the Applicant directly. Accordingly, where the Applicant does not wish to be contacted directly by the Canadian Trademarks Office, it is important to appoint a Canadian agent.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Patenting AI: Shift the focus to do it better
Patent protection is pursued for all types of technologies. Why should anything be different just because the technology is based on artificial intelligence (AI)? Nothing is different when reduced to...Read More -
Less guidance on fair dealing and TPMs?
On March 19, 2026, the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal set aside two declarations issued by Justice Roy of the Federal Court (Canada) that touched on the intersection of fair dealing and technologica...Read More -
All about CIPO’s 2026 updated guidelines and examples on patentable subject matter
On 25 March 2026, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) issued further guidance on the Patent Office’s understanding of patentable subject matter in relation to computer-implemented inventi...Read More
