The Industrial Design Office has announced that it is changing its practice with respect to industrial designs applied to buildings or structures.
Under the previous policy, designs applied to buildings or structures to be constructed on-site were not registrable because they were not considered to be “finished articles” to which a design may be applied. They were only registrable if the designs were capable of being “preformed, portable and delivered to purchasers as finished articles or in sections to be put together by a simple operation such as bolting”.
As of June 14, 2024, the Office will take the position that buildings and structures, including those constructed on-site, may be acceptable finished articles to which a design can be applied. The revised practice is applicable to all pending applications, regardless of their filing date.
The new policy is stated in section 13.02.03.04 of the Industrial Design Office Practice Manual.
This is a welcome development and the Office’s communication recognizes that “Broadening the scope of acceptable industrial design subject matter to include buildings and structures constructed on-site fosters and supports innovation and creativity by encouraging innovators in that industry to continue developing new designs for buildings and structures knowing that industrial design protection may be available.”
The change also aligns Canada with other jurisdictions, notably the United States, in which design patents are available for buildings and structures on-site. For example, Apple Inc. has obtained several patents for its building designs, including the cube design of its flagship store on Fifth Avenue in New York and its two-level store design in Joy City mall in China.
For more information, please contact a member of our Industrial Design practice group.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Adeia Guides Inc v Videotron Ltd: infringement through common design – a Canadian first
In the latest matter concerning Adeia Guides Inc’s (“Adeia”, formerly “Rovi Guides Inc”) patent enforcement campaign against Canadian cable service providers, the Federal Court held, for the first tim...Read More -
Not so nominal: damages available for brand owners facing evasive counterfeiters
Companies invest significant resources in building consumer awareness and goodwill in their brands. Over time, strong brands come to represent more than just a product name or logo; they may signal a ...Read More -
Brand protection online: Enforcement options for domain name takedowns
A well‑chosen domain name is a valuable brand asset. It serves as a powerful marketing tool by helping businesses stand out in a crowded digital landscape and attracting consumers to their websites. W...Read More
