Federal Circuit Provides First Guidance on AIA Derivation Proceedings
“The Board focused on who had been first-to-invent as opposed to who was first-to-conceive. But the court ruled that the error was harmless because the Board’s decision actually turned on who was first-to-conceive.”-Joshua Spicer
Related News & Media
-
Graham Hood speaks with The Globe and Mail’s Robyn Doolittle on the Labubu craze and counterfeits
Recently, Principal Graham Hood spoke with The Globe and Mail’s Robyn Doolittle on counterfeit Labubus, a toy that has gained worldwide popularity.Read More -
Tamara Céline Winegust discusses AI's threats, challenges and opportunities for Copyright Lawyers
Whether artificial intelligence (AI) will create more or less work for copyright lawyers is a question that demands a multi-layered response. Smart & Biggar Principal Tamara Céline Winegust shares...Read More -
Jean-Sébastien Dupont discusses litigation funding in the age of AI on IPHQ News
Although litigation funding has not yet influenced the intellectual property (IP) sector as strongly as it has other practice areas, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), both as a powerful analyt...Read More
