Federal Circuit Provides First Guidance on AIA Derivation Proceedings
“The Board focused on who had been first-to-invent as opposed to who was first-to-conceive. But the court ruled that the error was harmless because the Board’s decision actually turned on who was first-to-conceive.”-Joshua Spicer
Related News & Media
-
Principals Noel Courage and Ainslie Parsons explore strategies for protecting new plant varieties across key markets
Principals Ainslie Parsons and Noel Courage, along with expert international coauthors, recently contributed to an article in The Patent Lawyer Magazine examining how plant breeders and biotechs can p...Read More -
Janice Bereskin and Tamara Céline Winegust discuss a key trademark ruling in Canada for the Pharmaceutical Trade Marks Group
Principals Janice Bereskin and Tamara Céline Winegust recently wrote a feature for the March 2026 edition of Spotlight from the Pharmaceutical Trade Marks Group, exploring the implications of the rece...Read More -
Laura Easton speaks with Canadian Lawyer Magazine on AI hallucinations
Laura Easton was recently featured in Canadian Lawyer Magazine. She was interviewed by Jessica Mach on the growing number of Canadian court decisions involving AI-generated “hallucinations” in legal f...Read More
