Federal Circuit Provides First Guidance on AIA Derivation Proceedings
“The Board focused on who had been first-to-invent as opposed to who was first-to-conceive. But the court ruled that the error was harmless because the Board’s decision actually turned on who was first-to-conceive.”-Joshua Spicer
Related News & Media
-
François Larose comments on trademark implications of alleged counterfeit luxury goods sales in Le Journal de Montréal
Smart & Biggar Principal François Larose was recently featured in an investigative report by Le Journal de Montréal. The story examines allegations that a professional boxer, and former Olympian, ...Read More -
Jeff Leuschner discusses Patent Term Adjustment in Canada and the U.S. with IPHQ News
Principal Jeff Leuschner spoke with IPHQ News on Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) in Canada and Canada’s approach to PTA, which differs significantly from that in the US.Read More -
Daniel Anthony discusses personality rights protection in Canada with IPHQ News
Canada’s federal government and common law provinces do not recognize the general “right of publicity” that protects personality rights as a property right. Principal Daniel Anthony discusses personal...Read More
