Federal Circuit Provides First Guidance on AIA Derivation Proceedings
“The Board focused on who had been first-to-invent as opposed to who was first-to-conceive. But the court ruled that the error was harmless because the Board’s decision actually turned on who was first-to-conceive.”-Joshua Spicer
Related News & Media
-
Elliott Gold discusses the “not inherently distinctive” (NID) objection in IPHQ News
The 2019 introduction of the “not inherently distinctive” (NID) objection to trademark (TM) registration to the Canada Trademarks Act has presented a challenge for trademark registration applicants an...Read More -
Jeff Leuschner writes “Practice tips to seek patent term adjustment in Canada” for IAM Patents
Principal Jeff Leuschner recently wrote an article titled “Practice tips to seek patent term adjustment in Canada” for IAM Patents.Read More -
Jason Hynes discusses CIPO’s proposed patent “red tape” reduction initiatives in The Logic
The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) is considering fast-tracking applications for AI, quantum, energy and critical mineral patents to increase investment in those sectors. Recently, Smart...Read More
