Federal Circuit Provides First Guidance on AIA Derivation Proceedings
“The Board focused on who had been first-to-invent as opposed to who was first-to-conceive. But the court ruled that the error was harmless because the Board’s decision actually turned on who was first-to-conceive.”-Joshua Spicer
Related News & Media
-
Jason Hynes discusses CIPO’s proposed patent “red tape” reduction initiatives in The Logic
The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) is considering fast-tracking applications for AI, quantum, energy and critical mineral patents to increase investment in those sectors. Recently, Smart...Read More -
François Larose speaks with La facture about luxury counterfeits
Smart & Biggar Principal François Larose recently spoke with La facture about secondhand luxury accessories sold as "authentic", but that turned out to be counterfeit.Read More -
Jason Hynes weighs in on landmark AI patent ruling in Canada
Principal Jason Hynes was recently shared insights on the potential impact of Dusome v Canada (2025 FC 1809), a significant Federal Court decision that could reshape how artificial intelligence (AI) a...Read More
