Federal Circuit Provides First Guidance on AIA Derivation Proceedings
“The Board focused on who had been first-to-invent as opposed to who was first-to-conceive. But the court ruled that the error was harmless because the Board’s decision actually turned on who was first-to-conceive.”-Joshua Spicer
Related News & Media
-
Graham Hood discusses counterfeiting and knockoffs with IPHQ News
Principal Graham Hood spoke with IPHQ News on counterfeit Labubus, a toy that has gained worldwide popularity. The toys have become so popular that counterfeits, commonly referred to as “Lafufus”, are...Read More -
Nicholas Aitken discusses invention harvesting in IPHQ News
Invention harvesting is a concept that involves prompting and capturing a company’s internally generated inventions or ideas, including those whose significance has not yet been fully realized. Howeve...Read More -
Reagan Seidler discusses trademark protection and enforcement for CBC News
Intellectual property derives its value from exclusivity. In a segment called “Why ‘sex, drugs and lobster rolls’ is being trademarked,” Reagan Seidler spoke to CBC News about the necessity and challe...Read More
