Federal Circuit Provides First Guidance on AIA Derivation Proceedings
“The Board focused on who had been first-to-invent as opposed to who was first-to-conceive. But the court ruled that the error was harmless because the Board’s decision actually turned on who was first-to-conceive.”-Joshua Spicer
Related News & Media
-
Daniel Anthony discusses personality rights protection in Canada with IPHQ News
Canada’s federal government and common law provinces do not recognize the general “right of publicity” that protects personality rights as a property right. Principal Daniel Anthony discusses personal...Read More -
Chen Li discusses patent law and competition law with IPHQ News
Patent law and competition law are often viewed as being at odds, with one granting exclusive rights and the other promoting open markets. However, understanding how these two legal regimes interact i...Read More -
Herman Cheung discusses double patenting in Canada with IPHQ News
Canada’s double patenting regime has no provision for the United States-style “terminal disclaimers”, leaving the country’s applicants among the most vulnerable in the world to objections. Senior Asso...Read More
