On January 17, 2019, the Federal Court of Appeal heard the Attorney General of Canada’s appeal from a judicial review that quashed a Board decision that it has jurisdiction over Galderma’s DIFFERIN (0.1% adapalene). Our report on the Federal Court decision, 2017 FC 1023, is found here. Innovative Medicines Canada intervened in the appeal. The Federal Court of Appeal reserved judgment.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Ontario is the latest jurisdiction to implement a biosimilars transition policy
On December 20, 2022, Ontario announced it is implementing a biosimilars transition policy. Starting March 31, 2023, patients receiving coverage from the Ontario Drug Benefit plan for the following in...Read More -
Innovative Medicines Canada proposes framework for innovative agreements for drug reimbursement
Pharmaceutical manufacturers in Canada often enter into Product Listing Agreements (PLA), particularly with public payors, to facilitate their drug being reimbursed. It is common for PLAs to take the ...Read More -
Federal Court of Appeal restores Minister of Health’s decision to grant RUZURGI NOC despite FIRDAPSE data protection
The Federal Court found that subsection C.08.004.1(3) of the Food and Drug Regulations applied to prevent the Minister from issuing an NOC in view of the data protection granted to FIRDAPSE, a drug co...Read More