On September 24, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to Apotex (Docket No. 39172) with respect to a decision affirming the quantum of profits payable to the Plaintiffs ADIR and Servier for infringement of ADIR’S perindopril patent. As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal found that the Federal Court made no palpable and overriding error in holding that Apotex would not have used a non-infringing alternative from third-party manufacturers.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Pharmaceutical Litigation group.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Federal Court of Appeal confirms BYOOVIZ is confusing with Novartis’ BEOVU trademark
On November 28, 2025, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld an injunction against the use of the trademark BYOOVIZ for an ophthalmic biosimilar, confirming the application judge’s finding that the mark i...Read More -
2025 highlights in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law
In 2025, the Rx IP Update team at Smart & Biggar reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law.Read More -
Federal Court denies class action certification in generic drug price fixing case
The Federal Court has dismissed a request to certify a proposed class proceeding against a large number of generic drug companies named as defendants under sections 45 and 46 of the Competition Act: ...Read More
