Canada’s Intellectual Property Firm

Federal Court of Appeal affirms Minister of Health reasonable in concluding successor second person was entitled to benefit of NOA served by predecessor

Authored byBrandon Heard

On May 26, 2023, the Minister of Health determined that Biosimilar Collaborations Ireland Limited was entitled to the benefit of section 5 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations), including prior service of a Notice of Allegation by the previous owner of the new drug submission for YESAFILI (an aflibercept biosimilar). As previously reported, the Federal Court determined that the Minister of Health’s decision was reasonable. On February 13, 2024, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Bayer and Regeneron’s appeal: Bayer Inc v BGP Pharma ULC (Viatris Canada), 2024 FCA 29.

The FCA held that the Federal Court did not err in determining or applying the appropriate standard of review (reasonableness). The FCA explained that administration of section 5 of the Regulations “squarely falls within the purview of the Minister”, and the “Court’s role as first instance decision-maker arises only when a proceeding is initiated under section 6 of the Regulations.

Any further appeal would require leave from the Supreme Court of Canada.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Pharmaceutical Litigation Group.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and life sciences regulatory law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.