In a news release on June 7, the Government announced that it was suspending the implementation of the “private right of action” provisions in Canada’s anti-spam legislation (CASL), in response to broad-based concerns raised by businesses, charities and the not-for-profit sector. The private right of action would have allowed affected individuals to bring lawsuits against organizations and their officers, directors and agents for alleged CASL violations, and to claim compensatory damages, as well as statutory damages in the amount of $200 per contravention up to a maximum of $1 million for each day on which a contravention occurred. However, it is important to note that CASL otherwise remains in force, and complaints may continue to be investigated by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, which has the authority to impose administrative penalties of up to $1 million for individuals and $10 million for businesses. In particular the deadline for companies to transition from implied consent to express consent remains in place for July 1st.
With less than four weeks before the scheduled coming-into-force date for CASL’s private right of action, the Government stated that “Canadians deserve an effective law that protects them from spam and other electronic threats that lead to harassment, identity theft and fraud. At the same time, Canadian businesses, charities and non-profit groups should not have to bear the burden of unnecessary red tape and costs to comply with the legislation.”
The Honourable Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, added that “Canadians deserve to be protected from spam and other electronic threats so that they can have confidence in digital technology. At the same time, businesses, charities and other non-profit groups should have reasonable ways to communicate electronically with Canadians. We have listened to the concerns of stakeholders and are committed to striking the right balance.”
For those reasons, the Government announced that it would ask a parliamentary committee to review the legislation, in keeping with the existing provisions of CASL.
While it remains unclear whether the private right of action provisions will come into force at a later time, individuals and businesses, including foreign-based organizations, that send commercial electronic messages to Canada or are installing software in Canada, should welcome this opportunity to ensure full compliance with the provisions of CASL.
For further information, please contact a member of our firm’s Marketing & Advertising group.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
All clear? The importance of trademark clearance searching in Canada
This article outlines the benefits of trademark searching, different types of searches, and specific Canadian considerations, emphasizing the importance of proactive trademark clearance.Read More -
Angelcare and Playtex seal another win against patent infringer Munchkin
On August 17, 2023, the Federal Court issued its decision in Angelcare Canada Inc. et al. v Munchkin Inc. et al. (2023 FC 1111) regarding the Plaintiffs’ entitlement to certain remedies for patent inf...Read More -
Celebrating World IP Day 2024
For World IP Day 2024, we asked three of our practitioners three questions, all related to the World Intellectual Property Association’s 2024 theme of IP and the SDGs: Building our common future with ...Read More