The Federal Court previously found that Apotex and Cobalt infringed Bayer’s valid patent for an oral contraceptive composition combining drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol (Bayer’s YAZ and YASMIN) (2016 FC 1013, as reported here). The Federal Court subsequently held that Bayer was entitled to elect between damages and an accounting of Apotex’s profits (2016 FC 1192, as reported here). In so holding, the Federal Court disagreed with Apotex’s argument that it, rather than Bayer, should be entitled to elect whether Bayer should be limited to recovering Apotex’s profits. The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal of the latter decision, holding that “the proposition that the infringer of a patent can determine the remedy to which the patentee is entitled is an astounding proposition” (Apotex Inc v Bayer Inc, 2018 FCA 32). The Federal Court of Appeal affirmed that, under the Patent Act, a successful patentee always has a right to its damages, and only it has the right to elect an accounting of profits, subject to the court’s discretion.
Related Publications & Articles
-
2024 highlights in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law
In 2024, the Rx IP Update team at Smart & Biggar reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law.Read More -
Competition Tribunal refuses JAMP leave to commence ustekinumab abuse of dominance application
JAMP launched JAMTEKI, its ustekinumab biosimilar of STELARA, on March 1, 2024. Janssen launched its second branded ustekinumab product, FINLIUS, on July 2, 2024. JAMP commenced its application for ...Read More -
Federal Court rules on patent listing again, confirms generic not required to address patent submitted before ANDS filing but listed after
On January 20, 2025, Justice O’Reilly of the Federal Court dismissed Bayer’s judicial review of the Minister of Health’s decision to list Canadian Patent No. 2,970,315 (315 Patent) on the Patent Regis...Read More