As previously reported, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) granted Sanofi and Schering leave to amend their defences to plead the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v Apotex Inc., 2017 SCC 36 (“AstraZeneca”). In the underlying action, Apotex relies on Sanofi-Aventis Canada v Apotex Inc., 2009 FC 676 (“invalidity decision”) as a central element of its novel claims under the Ontario Statute of Monopolies, U.K. Statute of Monopolies and Trade-Marks Act. The invalidity decision found certain claims of Canadian Patent No. 1,341,206 invalid on the basis of the “promise doctrine”, which was subsequently rejected as “unsound” in AstraZeneca. The ONCA concluded that depriving Sanofi and Schering of the opportunity to argue that the invalidity decision is suspect would be “fundamentally unfair”. On January 7, 2019, Apotex applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (docket No. 38471).
Related Publications & Articles
-
Federal Court provides process guidance for summary judgment motions and trials
On June 22, 2026, the Federal Court released an amended version of the Case and Trial Management Guidelines for Complex Proceedings, Proceedings under the PM(NOC) Regulations, and Appeals under Subsec...Read More -
2026 mid-year highlights in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law
In the first half of 2026, the Rx IP Update team reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law. Below are our top storiesRead More -
Supreme Court of Canada: methods of medical treatment unpatentable, validity of Janssen’s paliperidone dosing regimen patent upheld
Today the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Pharmascience Inc v Janssen Inc, 2026 SCC 26 on the patentability of methods of medical treatment, dismissing Pharmascience’s appeal.Read More
