After the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) held that AstraZeneca’s patent relating to esomeprazole (NEXIUM) was not invalid for inutility and the SCC’s dismissal of Apotex’s post-judgment motion for reconsideration and rehearing, Apotex sought to raise new grounds of patent invalidity in the Federal Court, premised on “overpromising” under insufficiency, wilful misleading and overbreadth. Justice Locke dismissed Apotex’s motion (AstraZeneca v Apotex, 2018 FC 185): the validity of the patent was finally decided by the SCC; any doubt that might have remained about the SCC’s intent was resolved by the SCC’s dismissal of Apotex’s motion. Justice Locke also held that AstraZeneca was entitled to a declaration of infringement and ordered the quantification of AstraZeneca’s damages or Apotex’s profits. Apotex has appealed.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Supreme Court of Canada dismisses Apotex’s application for leave to appeal macitentan inducing infringement decision
On June 6, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Apotex’s application for leave to appeal (Docket No. 41087).Read More -
Supreme Court of Canada dismisses Apotex and Pharmascience’s applications for leave to appeal paliperidone inducing infringement decisions
On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Apotex and Pharmascience’s applications for leave to appeal (Docket Nos. 41162 and 41164).Read More -
2024 mid-year highlights in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law
In the first half of 2024, Rx IP Update reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law. The Rx IP Update team at Smart & Biggar has collected the top stories ...Read More