After the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) held that AstraZeneca’s patent relating to esomeprazole (NEXIUM) was not invalid for inutility and the SCC’s dismissal of Apotex’s post-judgment motion for reconsideration and rehearing, Apotex sought to raise new grounds of patent invalidity in the Federal Court, premised on “overpromising” under insufficiency, wilful misleading and overbreadth. Justice Locke dismissed Apotex’s motion (AstraZeneca v Apotex, 2018 FC 185): the validity of the patent was finally decided by the SCC; any doubt that might have remained about the SCC’s intent was resolved by the SCC’s dismissal of Apotex’s motion. Justice Locke also held that AstraZeneca was entitled to a declaration of infringement and ordered the quantification of AstraZeneca’s damages or Apotex’s profits. Apotex has appealed.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Federal Court of Appeal affirms paliperidone palmitate claims are not unpatentable methods of medical treatment
On February 1, 2024, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Pharmascience’s appeal. Per the FCA, whether a claimed dosing regimen is an unpatentable method of medical treatment cannot be based ex...Read More -
Federal Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of SPRAVATO “innovative drug” decision
On November 10, 2021, the Minister of Health refused to reassess its decision that Janssen’s esketamine hydrochloride product (SPRAVATO) was not an “innovative drug” and therefore not entitled to data...Read More -
Federal Court finds patent for concentrated methotrexate solutions obvious
On March 26, 2024, the Federal Court dismissed Medexus and Medac’s action for patent infringement of Canadian Patent No 2,659,662, finding the asserted claims invalid for obviousness: Medexus Pharmace...Read More